Pilkadal Antara Sistem “Otonomi Yang Sentralistis” Dan Good Local Governance
MetadataShow full item record
efficacy of Indonesian nation in conducting election of president and his proxy directly at 2004 breathing life into and optimism to carry out election of regent and governor as regional leader, along with his proxy directly also. Election of regional leader directly this election of direct regional leader (pilkadal) is presumably expected will improve the quality of our democracy. System democratize representative seems fail to gratify all combatants of democracy, because in the reality all members of DPR, either in state level, sub-province and province do not always stand up for elector people. Many places of money politic and abuse power of in general still uppermost, where all out for politicians maximize accomplishment of importance of them neglectfully making proper. This article question: is it true effective pilkadal to patch lacking of representative democracy? More than that, with autonomous scheme of sub-province and province under law governance of new area ( UU No.32/2004), is pilkadal will be able to educate governance good in both this governance level? To answer this question first of all will be expostulated by positive result and negative impact of UU No. 22/1999 concerning Governance of Area, then will be seen by citizen participation in relationship context center and area in UU No. 32/2004.